ZJSK.COM
welcome to my space
X
Search:  
 HOME   Starting a business
Starting a business
Published by: jack 2009-01-07
Welcome to:zjsk.com

  • I have already created an S-Corp for an IT related business. This business is owned by three people, including myself. There are no employees of the business, technically (noone is on payroll). Instead, we do work as independent contractors for the S-Corp. A good friend of mine, who is very experienced in business, has suggested that I create an LLC just for me. Ergo, any work that I do will be as my LLC, and the S-Corp will pay the LLC (not me, personally). Then, the LLC will pay me. Supposedly, this will benefit me when paying taxes. However, I am new at business and it seems overly complex (and would require more capital for startup fees), especially since I don't intend on making more than $20k/year for myself. I need a second opinion. Thanks.


  • daevux - As regards your clarification request - I don't believe you will be able to gain much financially by introducing an additional layer; if you were, then theoretically you could continue to implement such layers to the point where you would not be required to pay any taxes at all, right? Clearly, you would be able to show somewhat greater expenses by introducing another entity, but you would also incur a little bit of additional fees for incorporation and legal purposes + you will complicate your bookkeeping and increase the probability that one day you'll make the kind of mistake the IRS would go to town on... On the other hand, this is one possible way in which you could resolve the liability issue - but then the interim layer would have to be an LLC or worse, another S-Corp. I would not trade off the complexity for this added protection unless I was really worried about getting sued by my company/partners one day, in which case I'd probably not go into business with them in the first place. Does that answer your question? Please let me know, would be glad to provide further clarification if needed. thanks, ragingacademic


  • The biggest advantage to an LLC is that if the company goes bankrupt or does something illegal, you are less liable for those actions than you would be if the business were run as a sole proprietership.


  • I believe my friend is coming from a tax standpoint. He believes I can avoid the ~39% tax that IC's would have to pay. Can anyone think of how this would be possible? If it is - is it too complicated to be beneficial (or would I have to pay the difference for asprin) ? An acceptable answer that I'm looking for would just be a yay or nay and why as to if I should form a separate entity to represent just myself, what it should be (LLC, SP, etc), and how much I would save by doing so. Of course I would like to save money by paying little tax (within legal limits, of course), but I don't want me or my accountant to become confused or frustrated. I am aware of my state's (GA) fees for forming each entity, so you won't have to research that.


  • Hello Daevux ... Did your friend explain why he felt you should form a limited liability corporation to pay yourself through an S-Corp? It seems a bit convoluted when you already have a corporate structure in place to handle the liability issue, and taxation is taken care of in the pass-through advantages enjoyed by an S-Corp. I might be missing something here - so it would help to know why he suggested you form a corporation to be paid by a corporation. Any illumination would help. Regards, Serenata


  • daevux - Interesting and important question. I would recommend that you start a company as a sole proprietorship, rather than an LLC - startup fees for an sp are around $50-$60, and it will allow you to expense everything you need to. What kind of support would you like to see for such an opinion? thanks, ragingacademic


  • Here's an article from TaxMama.com, entitled "Setting Up Shop on The Web?" - http://www.taxmama.com/Articles-cur/BusinessOnWeb.htm While she does address California and Nevada corporations, specifically, she does mentions forming a second partnership (not corporation) and getting paid by the partnership. "You minimize that by creating another company , a partnership that is paid by your Nevada corporation. Your second company only receives enough money to cover expenses. Your Nevada corporation pays you a salary." At least there are some comparitive figures from which to draw some conclusions and/or clarify your question better. Is this the type of information you are looking for? I used the search term "s-corp payroll regulations" and it offered dollar comparisons, and wondered if this is the type of information you were looking for. Serenata


  • daevux - Again, thanks for your question. I started writing this really complex explanation of how you'd be taxed in each scenario, then realized that it's not really relevant - there are two important issues to consider here: 1) More income, less taxes - you'll all end up with more money in your pocket if you work as contractors for your S-Corp because - either as an LLC or as an SP - you'll be able to expense stuff you could not expense as an employee. Therefore, it is prudent to somehow make such an arrangement. 2) Liability - since you're already set up as an S-Corp vis-a-vis your company's clients, you are covered as far as liability is concerned - opposite your company's clients - whether you choose to go the LLC or the SP way. HOWEVER, as an SP, you are liable towards your S-Corp. This may not seem like a big issue right now, but if the three of you are not getting along as wonderfully a couple of years down the line, you may end up being sued by your own company one day... So, whether to go LLC or SP is somewhat related to how you predict your relationships with your partners will develop in the future. In addition, as I had pointed out earlier, the SP route is typically far less expensive. Would be glad to discuss further as required!! Please let me know if this reply has been satisfactory. thanks, ragingacademic


  • I would like to ask for a clarification on bullet 1, about taxes. I agree about the IC vs employee deal - I have already decided to work as an IC and not employee. My question is this: should I be an IC directly, or should I start a separate, smaller entity which is the IC for the S-Corp, and I work for the smaller entity (adding a layer between me and the S-Corp)?





  • What dress should i wear for an interview ?
    Financial Representative =Insurance salesman?

    You are looking at:zjsk.com's Starting a business, click zjsk.com to home
  • moving message rules in oe from one identity to another on the same computer
  • google listing and then disapperance
  • nail polish on carpet
  • sociology social studies social trends marketing consumer studies
  • info about myself or another individual how to screen a date
  • quotation from one of robert browning 39 s poems
  • find a former relative several tips
  • reverse fax telephone number
  • vacationing in st maarten
  • site missing from google
  • how can someone on a very expired visa correct her status and stay in the u s
  • better position for website damianos com
  • nbc scrubs episode 30 jan 03 song
  •  
  • new hard drive
  • broadway lyrics
  • search engine responses erroneous or cryptic
  • why is my page rank 0 for robertskelton ga please
  • no idea
  • google functions
  • telephone of solar rey co
  • personal information about individuals
  • reasearching self with google
  • derek tatum entrance on the simpsons
  • creating google g icon on desktop
  • looking of the name of a photographer
  • google listings banned linkstoyou how to fix how to correctly build traffic
  • pharmacovigilance organizations
  •  Homepage | Add to favorites | Contact us | Exchange links | LOGIN | Site map | 
    Copyright© 2008 zjsk.com        Site made:CFZ